This year, I decided to do an experiment. To build our MergeLane investor and mentor network, I dedicated four months to exclusively focus on meetings that involved skiing. From December 15, 2017, to April 15, 2018, I skied 75 days and 1,193,578 vertical feet. Hands down, it was the best four months of my life. I have never been happier or in better physical shape. It was an obvious success from a personal wellness standpoint, but I had to ask myself one question: Would I have been more productive if I had stayed home (I live in Boulder) and stuck to business as usual?
Let’s look at the numbers. Of my 75 ski days, 61 of them can honestly be classified as meeting/work-related. Of those, 11 were totally unproductive, 26 created a moderately positive outcome, and 10 of them created a really positive outcome. While I could have fit in more meetings if the activity was coffee versus skiing, I doubt I could have achieved 36 wins over the course of 120 days with business as usual.
For this reason, I think my experiment was a massive success. This is great news for a future of merging business with my very favorite activity, but on further reflection, I realized I was left with a couple of questions that might be of interest to you:
1) Why were my ski meetings such a success?
2) Can I apply those success factors to the 240 days a year that I can’t ski?
Here are the reasons I think my ski experiment was a win:
Authentic connections: I had the opportunity to spend the majority of the day with my connections. We rarely checked our phones and had little awareness of time or schedules. We had time to talk about personal and professional interests. We often connected on a deeper level than I typically achieve in a 30- to 60-minute coffee meeting.
Continuous connections: Because I mostly met with people who lived in the Vail Valley and skied frequently, I often had the chance to spontaneously reconnect with them multiple times over the course of the season.
Connection around a mutual personal passion: I was in my happy place and they were too.
A close-connected network: The Vail Valley is a small, close-knit community. Every meeting was an opportunity for a warm introduction. It was relatively easy to quickly build a network of credible people willing to share votes of confidence. Vail’s percentage of highly accomplished business leaders per capita certainly enhanced my success.
I was unique: Instead of being just one of a thousand venture capitalists, I was one of only a few.
Room for spontaneous connections: To accommodate ski and weather conditions, chairlift malfunctions, and other daily variances, I kept my commitments to about one ski meeting per day. However, my meetings rarely lasted all day. This gave me the chance to take advantage of unexpected opportunities. If the skiing was good, I would simply keep skiing. If it was terrible, I would sit at a coffee shop or in the locker room to catch up on email. Some of my most productive days were the result of random chairlift or locker room interactions.
Removal from the minutia: I was limited to about three hours of pre-skiing productive computer time per day. This forced me to stay hyper-focused on the most critical aspects of our business. As an Enneagram One who leans toward perfection, this was game-changing for me professionally and was perhaps the most critical component of the happiness I experienced over those four months.
I feel immeasurable gratitude for this experience and my personal circumstances that enabled it. A special thank you to my parents for graciously allowing me to live with them in Vail for four months, and to my husband for driving through snowstorms to see me on the weekends.
Since the conclusion of the ski season, I have incorporated my lessons learned into all of my meetings and work life. I have found that a similar combination of factors can be found in many other types of activities for which I and others share a passion. You likely have passions that may line these factors up well for you.
My new outlook on meetings and on life seems to be moving the needle. I hope this reflection can do the same for you.
In this Fund81 podcast episode, we talk about something that has made our team at MergeLane better investors - the Enneagram Personality Typing System. To talk about how the Enneagram can help other VCs, I invited Kaley Klemp to join the podcast.
As a venture capitalist, I am frequently surrounded by exceptionally high-performing and inspiring people. Until recently, I had never stopped to think about the impact of that.
We are big proponents of using the 15 Commitments in the work we do in Conscious Leadership. However, as an Enneagram Type 1 who is most happy at maximum productivity, I’ve always had a hard time buying into Commitment #9, the commitment to play and rest. Until yesterday….
I am extremely disciplined and focused. However, this can also be a detriment. Anything I perceive as a distraction from my to-do list feels stressful, and I have to constantly tell myself that off-the-to-do-list opportunities are often the best opportunities. I was recently reminded of that.
For the final episode of Fund81's first season, I interviewed Jaclyn Freeman Hester from Foundry Group. As someone relatively new to the industry, she has a fresh perspective on what's compelling to institutional investors and an incredible pulse on the landscape for emerging VC managers. Enjoy!
I’m trying to focus my time on opportunities to operate in my zone of genius and a few select priority areas in line with my passions and in which I feel I can make the most impact, aka my true north. To help all of us stay the course, I thought it might be helpful to share those priorities.
I gave first without question for almost five years. It came back to me in spades. I don’t regret it, and I think it was exactly the right thing for me to do at the time. But then….it just got to be too much.
Dave Balter, the CEO of one of our MergeLane portfolio companies, Flipside Crypto, shares his perspective on investing in the cryptocurrency space. Dave is obsessed with and extremely knowledgeable about cryptocurrency, and has an interesting perspective from both sides of the table.
Most venture capital funds target a minimum ownership percentage when making investments. In this Fund81 episode, Amish Jani, a founder and Managing Director of FirstMark Capital, shares his take on why ownership matters and how funds of different sizes and strategies determine ownership targets.
Venture capital funds are typically structured to have a 10-year lifespan, but venture-backed companies often take more than 10 years to achieve an exit and return capital to their investors. In this Fund81 podcast episode, we discuss solutions to this problem with our our guest, Roland Reynolds.