Monthly Recurring Revenue (MRR) is perhaps the most-referenced startup metric, but MRR is only applicable to companies that provide services to their customers through an ongoing contractual relationship, e.g., SaaS businesses (For more on MRR, read my previous post: MRR – The Definition and Formula for Monthly Recurring Revenue).
So what is the equivalent metric for non-subscription-based, non-SaaS companies?
The closest equivalent is Repurchase Rate. Like MRR, Repurchase Rate is a metric used to understand customer loyalty and the amount of revenue that can reasonably be expected from an ongoing customer relationship. Specifically, this metric is a calculation of the rate at which customers make repeat purchases. It is most commonly used in businesses that do not have a subscription-based business model, such as e-commerce and consumer product companies.
Repurchase Rate Formula
Repurchase Rate is calculated in two different ways.
If the customers who made multiple purchases within a period are only counted once, the repurchase rate is calculated by dividing the number of customers who made at least two purchases within a period by the total number of customers within that same period.
EXAMPLE: Company X has 300 customers over the course of a quarter and 30 of them made at least two purchases within that quarter.
30/300 = 10% Quarterly Repurchase Rate
If, however, the number of times a customer makes a purchase is considered, it should be calculated differently.
EXAMPLE: Company X has 300 customers over the course of a quarter. 270 customers made one purchase (no repeat purchase), 15 customers made two purchases (one repeat purchase), 10 customers made three purchases (two repeat purchases) and five customers made four purchases (three repeat purchases). The Repurchase Rate should be calculated as follows:
(15*2+10*3+5*4)/300 = 27% Quarterly Repurchase Rate
The first example seems to be the most commonly used calculation. If you are reporting this metric for MergeLane purposes (e.g., a MergeLane portfolio company completing our quarterly survey), please use the first method.
We are big proponents of using the 15 Commitments in the work we do in Conscious Leadership. However, as an Enneagram Type 1 who is most happy at maximum productivity, I’ve always had a hard time buying into Commitment #9, the commitment to play and rest. Until yesterday….
I am extremely disciplined and focused. However, this can also be a detriment. Anything I perceive as a distraction from my to-do list feels stressful, and I have to constantly tell myself that off-the-to-do-list opportunities are often the best opportunities. I was recently reminded of that.
For the final episode of Fund81's first season, I interviewed Jaclyn Freeman Hester from Foundry Group. As someone relatively new to the industry, she has a fresh perspective on what's compelling to institutional investors and an incredible pulse on the landscape for emerging VC managers. Enjoy!
Could I be more effective if I simply surrendered to a schedule that felt natural to me? After some serious self-reflection and experimentation, I can unequivocally say YES.
I’m trying to focus my time on opportunities to operate in my zone of genius and a few select priority areas in line with my passions and in which I feel I can make the most impact, aka my true north. To help all of us stay the course, I thought it might be helpful to share those priorities.
I gave first without question for almost five years. It came back to me in spades. I don’t regret it, and I think it was exactly the right thing for me to do at the time. But then….it just got to be too much.
Dave Balter, the CEO of one of our MergeLane portfolio companies, Flipside Crypto, shares his perspective on investing in the cryptocurrency space. Dave is obsessed with and extremely knowledgeable about cryptocurrency, and has an interesting perspective from both sides of the table.
Most venture capital funds target a minimum ownership percentage when making investments. In this Fund81 episode, Amish Jani, a founder and Managing Director of FirstMark Capital, shares his take on why ownership matters and how funds of different sizes and strategies determine ownership targets.
Venture capital funds are typically structured to have a 10-year lifespan, but venture-backed companies often take more than 10 years to achieve an exit and return capital to their investors. In this Fund81 podcast episode, we discuss solutions to this problem with our our guest, Roland Reynolds.
This year, I decided to do an experiment. To build our MergeLane investor and mentor network, I dedicated four months to exclusively focus on meetings that involved skiing.